Hydrogen Storage: Challenges, Solutions, Advanced Methods

Hydrogen as a carbon-neutral energy carrier, is pivotal for decarbonizing sectors like transportation and industry. However, its ambient gaseous state (0.08988 g/L at STP) poses significant technical challenges due to ultra low volumetric energy density (∼3 Wh/L vs. gasoline’s ∼9,500 Wh/L). Compact hydrogen storage or efficient storage is critical for enabling practical applications, driving multidisciplinary research across materials science, thermodynamics, and systems engineering.

The density of the hydrogen! The lightest of All!

The mass density of hydrogen gas at normal atmospheric pressure, temperature (NTP) is 0.0898 kg/m³. Comparing with the density of air which is approximately 1.225 kg/m³, hydrogen is approximately 15 times lighter than air at NTP. Find a detailed comparison: Hydrogen Compared with Other Fuels

At NTP, one litre hydrogen tank contains just 0.08376 g of Hydrogen where as one litre of gasoline/petrol has ~ 720 g of petrol.

Gasoline vapor density / Hydrogen density = 3.5 kg/m³ / 0.0898 kg/m³ ≈ 39. Therefore, hydrogen is approximately 39 times lighter than gasoline vapor.

A cubic meter of water weighs approx. 1,000 kilograms, where as a cubic meter of hydrogen gas weighs only 0.0898 kilograms. Therefore, hydrogen is approximately 11,940 times lighter than water at NTP.

Under normal temperature and pressure conditions (NTP), 1 kg of hydrogen occupies approximately 12,000 Litre, where as 1 kg of gasoline occupies just 1.34 Litre.

Hydrogen has 3× higher energy per mass than gasoline (33.3 kWh/kg vs. 12.7 kWh/kg). However, its gaseous state at NTP forces ~300× larger volume to store the same energy as gasoline.

Now you can easily imagine the density of the hydrogen!

Hydrogen Storage & Transportation challenges:

Due to its extremely low density, hydrogen in gaseous form takes up huge volume at normal atmospheric pressure. As a result, large, giant containers are required to store useful quantities of hydrogen in gaseous form in normal conditions. Thus hydrogen is virtually not stored or transported in gaseous form at atmospheric pressure because it is simply highly inefficient. Efficient and safe storage, transport of hydrogen is not a straightforward unlike fossil fuels gasoline, diesel, natural gas, coal, etc.,

Also hydrogen has very poor volumetric energy density, the amount of energy carried per unit volume.

Imagine a container holding one gallon of liquid hydrogen. That same amount of hydrogen, if it were a gas at standard temperature and pressure, would fill up a whopping 800 gallon containers approximately! This is because liquid hydrogen is incredibly dense compared to its gaseous form. When it changes state (from liquid to gas), it expands dramatically, undergoing a rapid phase change.

Volumetric Reduction is Crucial for Hydrogen Storage, Usage

• Practical Storage Size: Storing a usable amount of hydrogen energy at atmospheric pressure would require impractically large volumes due to its low density. Volume reduction is essential for practical applications.
• Vehicle Range and Packaging: For Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCEVs), volumetric energy density dictates fuel tank size and thus vehicle range. Higher density allows for smaller tanks integrated into vehicles.
• Transportation and Distribution Efficiency: Higher density enables more efficient hydrogen transport via pipelines, trucks, or ships, reducing infrastructure costs.
• Economic Viability: Reduced storage volumes can lower material requirements and infrastructure costs, improving the economic feasibility of hydrogen energy.

Hence for storage, transportation and for all practical purposes of hydrogen use, volumetric reduction is a must – it has to be compressed or super cooled to liquid state. This is the key limitation of using hydrogen as a fuel in mobility (Cars, ships, Trucks, etc.,). As hydrogen is produced at low production pressure (20-30 bar), hydrogen gas requires compression or state change to cryogenic liquid state before transportation.

Two Main Approaches to Hydrogen Storage:

A. Physical Storage:

Focuses on changing the physical state of hydrogen to increase its density for storage. Here there are two key traditional strategies: high-pressure compression and cryogenic liquefaction.

1. Compressed Gaseous Hydrogen: (CGH2) By compressing hydrogen gas to pressures ranging from 350 to 700 bar within specialized containment vessels, its density is significantly increased.

Volumetric Reduction Through Compression: 700 bar Gaseous Hydrogen

• Volumetric Reduction Factor (Approximate): Compressing gaseous hydrogen to 700 bar reduces its volume by a factor of approximately 400-500 times (ideally 700 times, but realistically considerably less due to real gas effects).
• Density Increase: This volume reduction is due to the increase in density from approximately 0.08376 kg/m ³ (gaseous STP) to 39.8 kg/m ³ (gaseous 700 bar) or 39.8 g/L
• Compressing beyond 700 bar, not much gain in volumetric reduction. At 1000 bar and above, approximately 49.5 kg/m ³ / 0.0495 kg/L

This is the most mature hydrogen storage technology, low cost. This energy intensive process needs approximately ranges 4.2 – 15% of the energy content (LHV) of the resulting compressed hydrogen.

• Technological Maturity: 700 bar CGH₂ storage is the most technologically mature and commercially established hydrogen storage method for vehicles today. It’s the technology used in current Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) like the Toyota Mirai and Hyundai Nexo.
• Reasonable Volumetric Energy Density: While lower than LH₂, 700 bar CGH₂ achieves a volumetric energy density that is sufficient to provide a practical driving range for passenger cars (e.g., 300-400 miles or more). The ~400-500 times volume reduction is enough for vehicle integration.
• Ambient Temperature Operation: CGH₂ operates at ambient temperatures (or slightly above due to compression heat), avoiding the complexities and boil-off issues of cryogenic systems. This simplifies tank design and operation for everyday use.
• Faster Refueling Times (Potentially): Refueling with compressed gaseous hydrogen can be relatively fast, comparable to gasoline refueling (around 3-5 minutes), which is a key advantage for consumer acceptance in vehicles.
• Developing Infrastructure (700 bar Focus): The developing hydrogen refueling infrastructure for light-duty vehicles is largely focused on dispensing compressed gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar. This existing and growing infrastructure supports the practicality of 700 bar CGH₂ for vehicles.
• Lower System Complexity (Compared to Cryogenics): CGH₂ storage systems, while still complex pressure vessels, are generally less complex than cryogenic LH₂ or CcH₂ systems, which require vacuum insulation, boil-off management, and specialized cryogenic components. This translates to potentially lower system cost and easier maintenance for vehicles.

2. Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) or Cryogenic LH2: Hydrogen can be liquefied at cryogenic temperatures (around -253°C). This dramatic phase change results in a roughly 800 times increase in its density compared to the gaseous state. This means that 800 times more hydrogen can be stored in the same tank or container. The tank needs specialized thermal insulation. Storing liquefied hydrogen in cryogenic tanks is a very complex, energy intensive process.

Volumetric Reduction Through Cooling: Liquefying Hydrogen

• Process: Cooling hydrogen gas to liquid hydrogen (LH₂) involves lowering its temperature dramatically, from room temperature (approximately 20°C or 293K) down to its boiling point of -252.87 °C (20.28 K) at atmospheric pressure.
• Volumetric Reduction Factor (Approximate): Liquefying hydrogen reduces its volume by a factor of approximately 800 times compared to its gaseous volume at standard temperature and pressure (STP).
  • Analogy: Imagine 800 liters of gaseous hydrogen at room temperature condensing into just 1 liter of liquid hydrogen.
• Density Increase: This volume reduction is a direct consequence of the dramatic increase in density upon liquefaction, from approximately 0.08376 kg/m ³ (gaseous STP) to 70.8 kg/m ³ (liquid LH₂) or 70 g/L

However, this cryogenic liquid approach presents significant challenges:

• Hydrogen has a low ignition limit, high diffusion rate in air, and a low boiling point (-252.8 C). These properties necessitate specialized infrastructure for safe handling, significantly increasing the overall cost of using hydrogen as a fuel. While these methods offer a path to increased density, the safety considerations and infrastructure costs associated with them limit their widespread adoption.
• Storing liquid hydrogen costs 4–5 times more than using compressed gas technology.
• Environmental heat (heat from outside air, environment) or boil off phenomenon can cause up to 2-3% of hydrogen vaporizes per day from the liquid cryogenic tank through the safety valve. This release of hydrogen could potentially pose a significant safety risk.
• This cryogenic process is also highly energy-intensive. In practice, the energy input for liquefaction is typically around 20- 35% of the energy content (LHV) of the resulting liquid hydrogen.

Key Comparison Table

3. Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen storage (CcH2): Combination of the above two, this method combines elements of both compressed and cryogenic storage. This approach aims to achieve higher storage densities than compressed hydrogen alone, while reducing the complexity of maintaining extremely low temperatures needed for liquefaction.

CcH₂ involves cooling hydrogen gas to cryogenic temperatures, but warmer than liquid hydrogen (e.g., Range of -40 to -100 C), and simultaneously compressing it to moderate pressures (e.g., 150-350 bar, and sometimes higher in research). It operates in a temperature and pressure range between liquid hydrogen and compressed gaseous hydrogen.

Intermediate Volume Reduction: Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen (CcH₂) offers a range of volumetric reduction factors depending on the specific temperature and pressure conditions used in the CcH₂ process. Approximately 500 to 600 times, CcH₂ achieves a volumetric reduction that is intermediate between CGH2 and LH2

Key Features of Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen (CcH₂)/ Challenges Addressed by CcH₂:

• Energy Efficiency: Avoids the 30% energy loss of LH₂ liquefaction.
• Material Costs: Lower pressure (vs. 700 bar CGH₂) reduces tank costs for large-scale systems.
• Boil-Off Mitigation: Moderate cooling (−40°C to −80°C) minimizes evaporation compared to LH₂.
• Lower Liquefaction Energy than LH₂: CcH₂ avoids the full liquefaction process, requiring less extreme cooling and potentially lower overall energy consumption for storage compared to LH₂.
• Technology Under Development: CcH₂ is a promising advanced storage concept, but the technology is still under development and not as commercially mature as compressed gaseous or liquid hydrogen storage. Research is ongoing to optimize CcH₂ systems for practical applications.

Cryo-Compressed Hydrogen [ CcH2 ] – Key Comparison

CcH2: Key Advantages Over Other Storage Methods

B. Material Based Storage:

This approach utilizes special materials both solids and liquids that act like “carriers” for hydrogen. These materials can bond with hydrogen molecules or atoms, either physically or chemically. This method offers several advantages over physical storage:

• Higher Storage Density: By binding with hydrogen, these materials can pack it in more tightly, increasing storage capacity.
• Improved Safety: The bonding with the carrier material can make hydrogen less volatile and easier to handle safely.

Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers (LOHCs): This promising approach is at the forefront of innovation. LOHCs store hydrogen by chemically binding it to readily available liquid molecules at ambient conditions. The hydrogen can then be released through a controlled dehydrogenation process. LOHCs offer a trifecta of benefits:

• Safe and Simple: No high pressure or extreme temperatures are needed, reducing infrastructure costs and safety concerns.
• Tailored Options: Different LOHC molecules can be chosen based on desired properties. Some options even utilize atmospheric derivatives like CO2, potentially capturing greenhouse gases during hydrogen production.
• Easy Separation: Hydrogen separation from LOHCs is achieved through simple condensation due to the use of high-boiling-point liquid molecules.

Toluene / Methylcyclohexane is a well-studied LOHC system.

Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): MOFs are porous crystal materials made of metal ions, where large pores within the crystals can store hydrogen gas1. MOFs have high surface areas and hydrogen adsorption capacities, where hydrogen molecules can cling to the surface of the MOF cavities. They have a simple charge/discharge mechanism, allowing the stored hydrogen to be released immediately upon discharge without the use of chemical reactions, which typically require high temperatures. MOFs have the potential to store hydrogen through adsorption at moderate pressures and temperatures.

Metal Hydrides: These materials store hydrogen through chemical bonding. This involves the formation of metal hydrides using elements like palladium, which has the capacity to soak up hydrogen up to 900 times its own volume, in addition to other elements such as magnesium, aluminum, and specific alloys. While some hydrides offer high storage capacities, challenges remain in terms of reversibility and energy efficiency of the hydrogen release process.

Nanomaterials: Nanomaterials are being explored for their potential in hydrogen storage.

Power Fuels: Power fuels are another form of material-based storage where hydrogen is stored in the form of power fuels.

Ongoing research is focused on developing new materials and techniques for even more efficient and safe hydrogen storage.

This article is Copyright protected